Gravity casting or HPDC? Start with wall thickness, volume and heat treatment
The most common mistake in process selection is treating high-pressure die casting (HPDC) as the “more advanced” option. The two processes solve different problems: one trades speed and pressure for output, the other trades a slower cycle for internal soundness.
HPDC: fast, but it traps gas
HPDC injects liquid aluminium into the die at high pressure and high speed, often filling the cavity in milliseconds. It suits thin walls of 1–3 mm, complex shapes and high annual volumes. Dimensional tolerance typically reaches CT4–CT6, surface finish is good and machining stock can be small. Tooling is expensive, but high volume spreads it.
The price is gas entrapment. Turbulent filling can fold cavity air into the metal, creating porosity. Ordinary die castings are therefore generally not T6 heat treated: gas expands during solution treatment and blisters the surface. Welding is also difficult. The thicker the section, the harder it is to feed the last metal to solidify, and the greater the risk of porosity and shrinkage.
Gravity casting: slower, but denser
Gravity casting fills the mould under the metal's own weight and can use sand cores for complex internal passages. Filling is calm, gas entrapment is low, and thick sections can be fed through risers. Internal soundness and ductility are usually better than ordinary HPDC, and the parts can be T6 heat treated and welded. That makes gravity casting suitable for cylinder heads, intake manifolds and bearing caps — parts that must seal, carry pressure or take load.
Dimensional tolerance is usually CT6–CT8, the surface is rougher and machining allowance must be sufficient. Cycle time is measured in minutes, which suits small-to-medium volumes and high-mix work. Consistency depends heavily on the foundry: gating, risering and chills decide whether shrinkage stays under control.
| Selection point | HPDC | Gravity casting |
|---|---|---|
| Typical wall | 1–3 mm thin walls | 4 mm and above is more comfortable |
| Annual volume | High; tooling must be amortised | Low to medium, high mix |
| Tolerance | CT4–CT6 | CT6–CT8 |
| Internal soundness | Moderate; gas entrapment risk | Good; thick sections can be fed |
| T6 heat treatment | Not for ordinary die castings | Suitable |
| Welding | Difficult | Possible |
| Tooling cost | High | Relatively lower |
| Internal passages | Limited by die cores | Sand cores can form oil and water galleries |
A short checklist
- Thinnest wall under 3 mm, high volume, dimensions and appearance dominate: evaluate HPDC first.
- Wall over 8 mm, T6, welding or tight leak requirements: prefer gravity casting, or evaluate low-pressure and squeeze casting.
- Complex oil or water galleries: sand-core gravity casting is the direct route.
- Volume too low to amortise a die: gravity casting is often cheaper overall.
- When in doubt, ask the supplier to run filling and solidification simulation before comparing tooling and piece price.
How Guoyang runs it
Guoyang keeps both routes in house: 25 gravity casting machines and 10 high-pressure die casting machines (DC280T–DC1200T). Customers are not asked to fit one line; the process follows wall thickness, volume, heat treatment and leak requirements. Cylinder heads and intake manifolds that need T6 and pressure tightness run on the gravity line; thin-wall, high-volume parts such as oil pans, gear chambers and brackets run on HPDC.